Skip to main content

Working With Stakeholders in Qualitative Research

How to involve stakeholders in qualitative research using Lookback, from early alignment and live observation to sharing evidence and discussions.

Henrik Mattsson avatar
Written by Henrik Mattsson
Updated yesterday

The impact of qualitative research is determined long before findings are presented.

Research creates value when it is:
• relevant to what stakeholders are working on
• visible while it is happening
• open to interpretation and discussion

Lookback is designed to support stakeholder involvement throughout the research process - not just at the end.


WHEN TO READ THIS

Read this article if you are:

• struggling to get stakeholders engaged with research
• presenting findings that feel disconnected from ongoing work
• working with clients or external partners
• trying to increase the impact of your research


IMPACT STARTS BEFORE THE FIRST SESSION

One of the most common failure modes in research is misalignment.

There is little worse than presenting carefully prepared research only to realize - in the room - that it does not connect to what stakeholders are currently working on.

This is not a quality problem.

It is a relevance problem.

In Lookback, impact is shaped early through:
• stakeholder interviews
• shared goals
• early visibility into sessions


EARLY INVOLVEMENT MATTERS

Stakeholders are far more likely to engage when they:

• recognize their own questions in the research
• see participants struggle or succeed in real time
• feel invited into the sense-making process

Lookback supports this by making live observation and early access easy, without disrupting the participant experience.


LIVE OBSERVATION AND THE OBSERVER LOBBY

Stakeholders can observe sessions live from the observer lobby.

They can:
• see and hear everything the participant and moderator do
• take timestamped notes
• discuss observations with each other
• submit questions to the moderator

The participant cannot see or hear observers.

This preserves the integrity of the session while enabling collaboration.


DISCUSSION ANCHORED IN EVIDENCE

Impact does not come from slides alone.

In Lookback, discussion happens directly on:
• recordings
• notes
• findings

Teams can:
• start threaded discussions
• @-mention teammates
• respond with video evidence rather than opinion

This keeps conversations grounded in what actually happened.


FINDINGS AS SHARED REFERENCE POINTS

Findings are designed to be small, concrete, and shareable.

They work well because they:
• are tied to specific moments
• preserve context
• are easy to revisit

Some findings stand alone. Others are best shared together through highlight reels.

The goal is not persuasion. It is shared understanding.


TIMING AND RELEVANCE

Even strong evidence can fail to land if it arrives too late or in the wrong context.

Lookback supports ongoing research work by:
• keeping findings accessible over time
• allowing stakeholders to dip in when needed
• supporting iterative research rather than one-off reports

This makes research more useful to teams that are continuously building.


WHAT TO READ NEXT

• Using Discover to Explore Research Data – for AI-assisted sense-making
• Roles and Access in Lookback – for stakeholder permissions and visibility
• Highlight Reels and Sharing – for packaging evidence

Did this answer your question?